AI Automation & Agents
Automate work that is still manual
I build agents and workflow automation that connect to your tools, keep humans in the loop where it matters, and stay reliable under real volume.
$50k+ earned · 33 Contra hires · 5.0 rating · Production AI, Web & Mobile
Perspective
Businesses searching for AI automation do not need another chat UI — they need operational systems that reduce manual load without creating silent failures.
I design approval gates, idempotent integrations, and clear ownership so automation is an advantage, not a liability.
Architecture I actually ship
- Custom agents and workflow orchestration (including n8n/Make where appropriate)
- CRM, email, docs, and internal tool integrations with audited actions
- Human approval steps for high-risk or irreversible actions
- Monitoring and retry strategies for production reliability
Related proof
- FoCoCo — Shipped App Store / Play product with voice logging, GPS context, and ongoing product engineering.
- The Vault Los Angeles — Built platform, app, seller portal, and admin — client planned ongoing retainer.
- menuRX — Flutter + native Swift/Kotlin with Gemini and Firebase — deterministic safeguards over raw LLM wraps.
- NutriLens AI — Nine verified completed engagements on a sustained AI/mobile build.
FAQ
Agent vs workflow — which do we need?
If the path is mostly deterministic, use workflows. If judgment and tool choice vary, use agents — often both, with clear boundaries.
Will this replace our CRM?
No. Automation sits in front of systems you already trust. The lead path on this site is an example of that pattern.